Clitic climbing revisited

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2002.4

Abstract

Presently, there is overall consent among researchers on Romance in HPSG (Miller and Sag, 1997, Abeillé et al., 1998, Monachesi, 1996, 1999) that bounded clitic climbing (CC) is best understood in terms of argument composition. Despite the fact that all current analyses of CC are based on the same core idea, individual analyses of this phenomenon differ.
In this paper, I shall propose a unified approach that will be applicable to CC in both French and Italian. The approach will be cast entirely in terms of valence lists, argument structure and slash, such that construction- or language-specific book-keeping devices can be eliminated. As a side-effect, this approach provides a more strengthened view of lexical integrity, in that morphological information, i.e. an argument's mode of realisation, will not be directly accessible for subcategorisation.

Downloads

Published

2003-04-01

How to Cite

Crysmann, Berthold. 2003. Clitic climbing revisited. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar 67–89. (doi:10.21248/hpsg.2002.4) (https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/view/476) (Accessed November 21, 2024.)