What grammars are, or ought to be





Progress toward distinguishing clearly between generative and model-theoretic syntactic frameworks has not been smooth or swift, and the obfuscatory term ˋconstraint-based' has not helped. This paper reviews some elementary subregular formal language theory relevant to comparing description languages for model-theoretic grammars, generalizes the results to trees, and points out that HPSG linguists have maintained an unacknowledged and perhaps unintended allegiance to the idea of strictly local description: unbounded dependencies, in particular, are still being conceptualized in terms of plugging together local tree parts annotated with the SLASH feature. Adopting a description language with quantifiers holds out the prospect of eliminating the need for the SLASH feature. We need to ask whether that would be a good idea. Binding domain phenomena might tell us. More work of both descriptive and mathematical sorts is needed before the answer is clear.


Additional Files



How to Cite

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2019. What grammars are, or ought to be. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar 58–78. (doi:10.21248/hpsg.2019.4) (https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/view/867) (Accessed April 17, 2024.)